Navy Museum Hosts Panel on Formerly Classified Undersea CIA/Navy Mission

Trieste Event 1Last night, the US Navy Museum hosted a special panel presentation entitled “An Underwater Ice Station Zebra: Recovering a Secret Spy Satellite Capsule from 16,400 ft Below the Pacific Ocean” The subject for the evening was the once classified 1972 mission to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. Early that year, a film capsule from an American photoreconnaissance satellite, codenamed HEXAGON, was dropped from orbit in a small container, for retrieval at sea. The mission encountered a major problem when the capsule’s parachute malfunctioned, and the capsule plummeted more 3 miles below the surface of the Pacific Ocean, north of Hawaii. Only the US Navy had the technology to retrieve the capsule, and the advanced Trieste II (DSV 1) Deep Sea Vehicle was dispatched to complete what was at the time the deepest undersea salvage mission ever attempted.

A panel of experts was convened at the Navy Museum to discuss this dangerous and challenging undersea mission. The panel consisted of:

  • David Waltrop, CIA Historical Collections Division
  • Lee J. Mathers, former US Naval Intelligence Officer
  • LCDR Beauford Myers, USN (Ret.), former Executive Officer, USS White Sands (ARD 20)
  • CDR Richard Taylor, USN (Ret.), former Trieste II (DSV-1) pilot
  • CAPT Don Walsh, Ph.D., USN (Ret.), Officer-In-Charge, Trieste, 1960 Marianas Trench Dive

The Museum was packed for the event, with over 100 guests in attendance. The panel walked the audience through the steps required to recover the capsule, and following their presentation, answered questions. After the event, the Naval Historical Foundation, supported by Oracle Corporation, hosted a reception for all of the guests in attendance, which included a buffet meal and beverages.

To learn more about the mission, please visit the Central Intelligence Agency website. And don’t forget that the first Trieste Deep Sea Vehicle is on display in the Navy Museum.

Trieste Event 2

Posted in History, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Museum Store Stocks Bric Tek Navy Warship Building Block Kits

Bric Tek Carrier

The Navy Museum store, located in the National Museum of the United States Navy at the Washington Navy Yard, recently began stocking Bric Tek building block kits of simulated naval warships. We currently stock seven different construction kits, ranging from a small frigate, all the way to a huge helicopter carrier (seen above) consisting of nearly 2,000 pieces. These Bric Tek sets are fully compatible with LEGO building blocks. Many of the ship sets come with smaller aircraft including helicopters and jets, and the carrier set even includes a hovercraft that can be safely stowed in a well deck! The sets also include poseable figures with guns, radios, and other attachments.

We’re pleased to announce that these new kits are being offered at a 20% discount if you order soon. We currently have a number of the sets built and on display in the Navy Museum, if you visit the Museum please be sure to check them out. And if you don’t have the chance to come in person, be sure to check out the Museum Store Online, where you can order the sets and have them shipped to your home.

Posted in Navy Museum, News | 2 Comments

NHF Working to Commemorate 40th Anniversary of POW Return

Battle Behind BarsThis year marks the 40th anniversary of the return of American Prisoners of War held by the North Vietnamese. Many of the POWs were naval aviators, and the Naval Historical Foundation, in conjunction with the National Museum of the United States Navy, is working on a number of initiatives to remember the long ordeal endured by these brave Americans. We hope that you’ll follow along with our efforts, and even consider a donation to support this important work.

The centerpiece of our 2013 efforts will be a new display and video for the Cold War Gallery, to augment the historic POW-related items already on display in the Gallery. We’ve been hard at work developing a concise, compelling display to tell the overall story of the POW ordeal, and to help provide better interpretation and context for the items currently on display. Included in these new components will be a 6 minute video, under development by R.H. Rositzke and Associates. The display, video, and artifacts will be showcased at the Foundation’s Annual Meeting on Saturday, 15 June 2013. Details of the meeting, which will feature speakers including a former POW, will be forthcoming.

Additionally, we are raising funds to bring the 2010 publication “The Battle Behind Bars” back into print – stay tuned for further details. This story of Navy and Marine POWs in the Vietnam War was penned by Stuart I. Rochester, and published by the Naval History and Heritage Command thanks to funding provided by the Naval Historical Foundation. In the meantime, until we can get the book reprinted, you can download a PDF of “The Battle Behind Bars” from the Naval History and Heritage Command website at this link.

Posted in Cold War Gallery, History, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Warships of the Ancient World, 3000 – 500 BC

wood-warships-ancient-worldWritten by Adrian K. Wood and Illustrated by Giuseppe Rava.  Osprey Publishing, Ltd., Long Island City, NY. (2012)

Reviewed by John R. Satterfield, DBA.

Writing about human activities in the Bronze and early Iron Ages is a daunting task. Evidence from these eras is fragmentary at best, like a jigsaw puzzle with far more pieces missing than available. Focused examinations on specific topics must rely on even sketchier resources. Earliest examples of writing or illustrations that survive are typically clay tablets or inscriptions on monuments or buildings, and nearly all of these artifacts are remnants.

From this standpoint, Adrian Wood’s little book on ancient warships in the Mediterranean and Middle East, really a bound essay, is a serviceable primer to an obscure topic, made even better by photos and line drawings from original relics and color illustrations by Giuseppe Rava showing various ship profiles and depictions of vessels in action.

Wood covers the period between 3000 and 500 BCE, roughly contiguous with the dawn of writing and recorded history, in the Mediterranean, and the Bronze Age. By this time, ship construction, a natural outgrowth of the region’s dependence on the Mediterranean for commerce and trade as well as exploration and conquest, was well developed, probably originating on the Nile in Egypt and rivers in the Fertile Crescent.  Boats using rudimentary sails and paddles or oars traveled between villages by hugging the Mediterranean coastline.  These tiny craft evolved gradually into larger vessels capable of carrying significant cargoes or numerous passengers on longer voyages in open water.  Sea voyages also facilitated warfare, as tribes with access to the coast launched expeditions to loot adjacent areas and enslave potential rivals.

Early on, however, vessels used for conquest were not purpose built and handled a variety of commercial and military missions. As societies grew larger and more sophisticated, rivalries intensified, and regional kingdoms developed ships capable of defending their coasts from all too frequent raids. Not all such societies, of course, had comparable maritime capabilities.  Ship building required timber, a scarce commodity in Egypt and North Africa, and early civilizations focused much of their wealth and power, if they enjoyed these advantages, on acquiring construction materials.  Those who could build fleets quickly achieved dominance, sometimes extending through centuries, over less fortunate kingdoms.

Wood begins his review of ancient warships in Egypt, exploring the types of ships they used based on illustrations and other documentary evidence, probable construction techniques and maritime tactics. He follows this approach with other civilizations, arranged in loosely chronological order, covering on the societies that relied on the sea for their perpetuation.  After touching on the Sea Peoples, a nomadic group of indefinite origin who are known almost entirely from the derivative descriptions by the kingdoms they attacked, the author turns to the Minoan Crete, Bronze Age Syria, Phoenicia and the city states in the Levant, and finally pre-classical Greece.

The extent of Wood’s evaluation of each of these societies is based on the availability of illustrative and documentary materials from each period and the relative importance of maritime activity in the cultures reviewed.  For example, at least a third of the narrative focuses on Greece, and I’m sure this emphasis derives from the relatively large cache of information already presented in numerous scholarly works, not cited in the text but several of which the author thoughtfully includes in a brief bibliography that also relies on primary sources ranging from the Old Testament to Greek histories and commentaries.

Many readers with interest in ancient warships are familiar with the trireme and its extensive role in Greek maritime war-fighting during the classical period, but this book is useful because it clearly describes the developmental thread from much earlier designs that originated millennia before the trireme appeared.   Design elements in early vessels cross cultural lines and provide a consistent foundation for subsequent improvements.  Ancient galleys, used for war and commerce, contained a single row of as many as 25 oars port and starboard, a single mast with a simply rigged square sail, usually furled during combat, large steering oars for directional control and often a ram on the prow.  Dedicated warships utilized a narrow deck between the oarsmen for archers or other troops and platforms or castles at bow and stern for boarders. Greek pentekonters , narrow-beamed vessels with single rows of 25 oars, and later hekatonters with double rows of up to 120 oars in similar-sized hulls, were streamlined versions of earlier multi-role ships  and used almost always for warfare, leading directly to the trireme.

Wood’s essay is a nice introduction to a little-studied subject and is worth the time to read if only to show the long, steady advance in maritime technology in the Mediterranean that made naval vessels and subsequent developments such a critical part of global military and naval history.

Dr. Satterfield writes on military topics and teaches history and business at Wilmington University in New Castle, Delaware.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Uncommon Warriors: 200 Years of the Most Unusual American Naval Vessels

sayers-uncommon-warriors-unusual-naval-vesselsBy Ken W. Sayers, Naval Institute Press: Annapolis, MD, (2012).

Reviewed by Jennifer Daley

The United States Navy has a strong history of developing unique vessels to combat specific roles beyond the realm of traditional battleships and submarines. In the 2012 publication, Uncommon Warriors: 200 Years of the Most Unusual American Naval Vessels, author Ken W. Sayers describes in detail the range and military contribution of these unique vessels. Sayers’ background as former Navy officer, as well as former staff member of the assistant secretary of defense (public affairs), affords him the strategic position to examine and analyze unconventional naval vessels. Uncommon Warriors is indispensable as a reference guide to some of the most interesting naval vessels in American history. Both professionals and hobbyists will find this book captivating and useful. Sayers does an excellent job at uncovering the history behind these often overlooked, yet important, naval structures.

The Navy has historically re-fashioned existing vessels for specific new roles while also developing entirely new floating vessels. Referred to as auxiliary (AG) and miscellaneous (IX) vessels, they are the subject of this book. Sayers writes in his introduction, “Over the years, the AG and IX family has included among its varied members some very unique ships and boats, such as: The legendary ‘Old Ironsides,’ the oldest commissioned warship in the world still afloat—-Constitution (IX 21); A Civil War celebrity, Farragut’s flagship at the battle of Mobile Bay, and Norman Rockwell’s floating studio in 1918—-Hartford (IX 13); a super secret CIA ship that raised part of a Soviet ballistic missile submarine from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean—-Glomar Explorer (AG 193); The Navy’s oldest steel-hulled warship still existent, an iconic veteran of the Spanish American War, and an official National Historic Landmark—-Olympia (IX 40)….” (pp. xv-xvi)

Uncommon Warriors contains in-depth descriptions of historical significance of ships and boats that the author has identified, from a compilation of almost 500 AG/IX watercraft. Sayers writes, “Among the many roles they filled were: presidential yacht, aircraft carrier, historic relic, radio-controlled target towing, acoustic research, Trident missile testing, hydrographic and geological surveys, torpedo transport, floating armory for naval militias and reservists, Antarctic exploration, station tanker, school ship, ammunition disposal, flagship, explosives testing, ice breaking, prison ship…In sum, these vessels were a virtual navy within the Navy—-taken together, a fleet of more than 470 heterogeneous vessels that generally had one thing in common: at one time or another they had been classified officially as either an AG (general or miscellaneous auxiliary) or IX (unclassified miscellaneous) vessel.” (p. xiii)

The organization of this book is especially pleasing. Sayers adopts a logical method of walking the reader through the various chapters in natural progression. He begins with an overview on the origins and roles of these unique vessels. He then proceeds with an explanation of classifications and designations, followed by abbreviations and special terms so as to ensure that the reader has all the tools necessary to intellectually enjoy the read. Thirty-four chapters follow, which highlight various ships, their history and significance. These chapters are enhanced with 50 black-and-white photographs that enable the vessels to come to life. Additionally, a plethora of informational tables throughout the book help the reader truly understand the vessels’ specifications and duty. The book also includes a comprehensive directory of all AG and IX ships, which is interesting for its breadth and depth. A fine bibliography offers areas of additional research while the index of ship names provides a quick-glance reference guide.

Author Ken Sayers has successfully executed a remarkable research project in Uncommon Warriors: 200 Years of the Most Unusual American Naval Vessels. His writing style is professional yet inviting. I only wish, though, that the project would have demanded a larger budget so as to include greater, colorful photographs in a more substantial hardback format. Nonetheless, Uncommon Warriors is well researched and factually presented.

Jennifer Daley is a Ph.D. candidate, The Department of War Studies, King’s College, The University of London.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – The Zimmermann Telegram

boghardt-zimmerman-telegramBy Thomas Boghardt, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD (2012)

Reviewed by Capt. Winn Price USNR (Ret.)

I thoroughly enjoyed this tale from the black world of cryptology. Espionage novels replete with the ‘shaken-not-stirred’ womanizers and drivers of fast cars, abound in fiction and non-fiction. Codebreakers have not received glorification in a similar genre of novels.  Probably the foremost impediment to ‘cipher thrillers’ is the tedious, attention-to-detail process of breaking codes that does not require fast women and faster cars as accessories.

We can blame David Kahn dampening the non-fiction market with his magnificent history, The Codebreakers, which for nearly fifty years has stood as the gold standard. The tortuous and lengthy declassification process can be discouraging to historians as well. But the story of the Zimmermann telegram has enough twists and turns to keep the attention of even a jaded James Bond. U.S. Army Center of Military History senior historian Thomas Boghardt is a thoughtful, technically astute, balanced investigator and fine author of prose.

Until Boghardt’s The Zimmermann Telegram, the foremost book available was Barbara Tuchman’s history by the same title. So you might ask why be so bold as to compete with the great historian, Tuchman? As Boghardt points out in his introduction, when first published in 1958, Tuchman’s book did not benefit from access to many relevant but still classified cryptology documents some of which were only declassified as late as 1983. She also made less use of German language materials than the current book.

In January of 1917 Arthur Zimmermann, the foreign secretary of Kaiser’s Germany sent a telegram to his embassy in Mexico City for prompt delivery to the host government. He informed the Mexicans that unrestricted submarine warfare would commence on February 1st, 1917.  Contingent on America then declaring war on Germany, Zimmermann proffered an alliance for the purpose of the Mexicans reacquiring the lost territories of Arizona, New Mexico, and, Texas upon a German victory over the allies. The Germans anticipated that Mexican incursions along the border would retard the entry of American troops (my grandfather being one) into the Western Front.

Interesting but even more implausible, Berlin had reserved California for the Japanese if the Mexicans could beguile their entry into the war on the side of the Germans.

Here is the rub. Immediately following the declaration of war in 1914, the Royal Navy severed the German underwater telegraphy cables. Henceforth the Germans relied mainly on the American and Swedish diplomatic transatlantic channels (conveniently surfacing in England) to transmit this very sensitive (“Most secret. Decipher yourself”) invitation to their embassy in Washington.  The telegram would travel from the embassy in Washington to Mexico City and thence to the Mexicans (who were not much interested in the offer).  We, naively believing that other people’s mail should be left unread, did not attempt to decode the hosted German traffic. And of course the Germans had promised the neutral America that all of their traffic was routine and administrative.

Alas somebody intercepted and was decoding German telegraphy (and American diplomatic traffic as well). British naval cryptographers in ‘Room 40’: the most colorful character (no shortage here) of the tale, Captain William Reginald ‘Blinker’ Hall, director of British naval intelligence, handed a deciphered copy of the German telegram to the U.S embassy in London. So you might be wondering how did he do that without revealing that he was also an avid reader of U.S. diplomatic traffic? Good question and one subject to intrigue, lies, and deception that extended nearly until World War II. And for the answer … read the Zimmermann Telegram. You won’t be disappointed.

Finally, if the history of cryptology is of interest, allow me to suggest a visit to the little known National Cryptologic Museum at Fort Meade, Maryland. The museum is open to the public and offers free tours guided by former cryptologists. The Zimmermann telegram occupies one of the more prominent displays.

Winn Price has been researching the first Navy secret code developed in 1887 by Cdr. Hubbard and four newly commissioned classmates from ’85, including Ens. Coontz. The code permitted the navy to use Western Union for communications with shore bases and deployed ships visiting ports.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Seabee Teams in Vietnam, 1963 – 1968

bingham-seabee-teams-vietnamEdited by Kenneth E. Bingham. NMCB-8 Association, Ventura, CA (2013).

Reviewed by Charles Bogart

The subtitle of this book is “The 13-Man Teams That Helped Rural Vietnamese and who Fought Alongside the Special Forces.”  The introduction of the book under review proclaims that it consists of excerpts taken from the book “COMCPAC REPORTS, Special Edition, Seabee Teams Oct. 1959 – July 1969”, by Lt. Joseph L. Henley and Chief Journalist Thomas A. Johnson.  This COMCPAC report as written covered not only Seabee Teams that served in Vietnam but also in the Americas, Africa and Thailand. The editor of the book under review has chosen to use within his book only information concerning those teams that saw service in Vietnam.

During the time period of 1963 – 1968, sixteen Naval Mobile Construction Battalions deployed 83 Seabee Teams to Vietnam. The men of these teams undertook general civic development activities, built military bases, and became involved in a number of combat actions. As a result of these activities the men of these teams were awarded the full range of combat decorations, including one posthumous Congressional Medal of Honor.

The book under review is divided into three sections. The first section provides an excellent overview of the why and how the teams were created and deployed to Vietnam. The next section contains one to three page summaries of each team’s accomplishments while in Vietnam. The narrative is supported by a number of photographs that help to bring to life the text. The book closes with a chronological overview of significant events that the teams participated in plus a summarization and evaluation of the accomplishments of the teams while in Vietnam.

The first section of this book should be of interest to anyone wondering how an idea is conceived, formulated on paper, staffed, and then is approved. This is however only part of the battle as once approved the concept has to funded to cover training, equipment, and personnel before a concept can become a reality. The idea of Seabees engaging in counter insurgent operations was not met favorably by the CNO when first presented to him, but eventually the idea of forming Seabee Teams to provide training and technical assistance to friendly nations was accepted and became a reality. The teams consisted of one officer and twelve enlisted men who underwent 18 weeks of special training to prepare them to perform their tasks while living with an indigenous population.

The summarization of each teams tour within Vietnam, as presented in the book, is part press release and part historical documentation. This is said not to diminish the accomplishments of the teams, but to note that each teams account is written to serve two purposes, tell a positive story to the American public and preserve a historical account of what happen during the teams deployment.

This book should be of interest to anyone studying counter insurgent operations and nation building. We see here the Seabee using both his construction skills and his war fighting abilities to help others. The book provides positive reinforcement as to why the Navy needs construction workers who also have small arms fighting ability. Yes these teams were often deployed to areas from which they were able to provide direct support to the Navy, but these teams did make a very positive visual display of a caring U.S. Navy.  The team members also brought back into the Navy a better understanding of the problems the Navy would encounter as countries friendly to the United States were racked by turmoil growing out of social or nationalistic goals.

The editor is to be commended for taking a U.S. Navy report of limited distribution and re-publishing it so that more may gain insights on nation building from lessons learned during the Vietnam war.

Charles H. Bogart is a frequent contributor to Naval History Book Reviews and was named a 2011 Naval Historical Foundation Volunteer of the Year.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Raising Missouri

veit-raising-missouri-steam-frigateBy Chuck Veit, Lulu.com, Raleigh, NC. (2012)

Reviewed by David Kronenfeld

Chuck Veit in Raising Missouri has put together a tidy little volume detailing a little known footnote of American naval history – the sinking and salvage of USS Missouri. This is Veit’s third book and continues in the vein of his focus on 19th century American naval history. Veit utilized the self-publication platform Lulu.com to bring this work to fruition. Without self-publication venues such as Lulu.com such a book might not have been brought into print and Veit should be commended for using Lulu to bring an obscure, but notable event to the reading public.

In the first two chapters, Veit details the planning, building and early life of Missouri – one of America’s first steam powered warships. In subsequent chapters, Veit goes on to describe the events surrounding the ship’s 1843 sinking in Gibraltar harbor and how she threatened to destroy the harbor’s usefulness as silt gathered around her remains. Next, the book documents the failed salvage attempts of Missouri and the bruise to the national ego that she inflicted. Interspersed throughout the book’s storytelling is the backstory of the development of steam propulsion and primitive diving suits. Veit’s description of 19th century diving and salvage efforts is especially intriguing for anyone interested in diving for work or pleasure. Finally, Veit concludes with the heroic against-all-odds salvage of the Missouri performed by American entrepreneur John Gowen.

Raising Missouri excels in its readability as well as the meticulous footnotes Veit provides. The book is also well-illustrated with helpful diagrams, period drawings and pictures as well as copies of primary documents. Considering that I prefer the use of footnotes over endnotes, I found Veit’s documentation excellent and incredibly helpful to the reader. Veit has obviously mastered the subject and exerted immense amounts of research to write the most accurate account possible of the events surrounding Missouri’s life and salvage. Readers desiring a quick, but highly engaging read would be well advised to pick up a copy of Raising Missouri.

David Kronenfeld is a corporate attorney and maintains the blog www.shipwreckology.com.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Aboard The Pirate: Roving The West Indies (novel)

cherry-pirate-west-indiesBy Veronica Cherry, Gallant Books, (2012)

Reviewed by Nathan Albright

In reading this dramatic and action-packed novel about piracy and children in extreme peril, it is difficult not to suspect that the author has a variety of personal and professional motives in framing the story as she does.  The novel begins and ends with a slight time shift, in that two Coast Guardsmen fighting on the front lines of the drug war interact with a couple of characters of the previous period of widespread piracy at the beginning of the 19th century in the Gulf Coast, which gave us antiheroes like the Lafitte brothers and Jose Gaspar.  Included among these possible lessons includes the relationship between piracy as well as the illicit trafficking of souls and drugs and the moral corruption of those who conduct and turn a blind eye to the trade.

It is also obvious from the author’s blunt approach to children in peril as well as frequent lewd comments that the author’s background as a survivor of child abuse appears to have been at least a contributing factor to the way that this novel is written.  This is not a novel for those who are squeamish about rape and murder and the degradation that people can suffer at the hands of the wicked.  Indeed, when the heroine of this novel is introduced, she is a twelve year old seeking to seduce much older men for compensation at the encouragement of her mother, who responds to a rebuke about her poor parenting with the retort:  “How dare you tell me how to raise my child (59).”  There are a lot of aspects of this novel, given my own personal background, that were unpleasant to deal with, and the author is honest and unromantic in her portrayal of the early 1800’s world of piracy.

The plot follows a variety of characters, including a British midshipmen who had been kidnapped after getting drunk in New Orleans, the aforementioned young lady who escapes being pimped out by her mother and becomes a stowaway and eventually a queer sort of pirate by pretending to be a man (albeit not very well), an African slave who seeks his freedom and a return trip home across the Atlantic, a bachelor mariner introduced as a potential customer in prostitution who shows himself to be an honorable and decent man, if unsuccessful in finding marriage, a group of pirate captains who have varying but slight to no degrees of personal honor and integrity, including one pirate (Jose Gaspar) who is still celebrated to this day by the city of Tampa as one of their civic heroes, and another couple of pirate (the Lafitte brothers) who provided valuable services to the United States during the War of 1812, but whose piratical ways eventually ended in their exile and (presumably) death.

While dealing with the grim reality of piracy, the novel also looks at how the response to piracy was hampered by a variety of factors, including the lack of political will on the part of nations to cooperate with others against the scourge of piracy or to put the resources into building ships and training crews to fight against pirates, or even the political will on the part of corrupt civic leaders to arrest pirates instead of participate in the illicit trade as partners in crime.  The fact that these same elements exist where piracy is still a global problem and where the drug trade is involved gives a common tie between the early 1800’s and our own supposedly much more enlightened world.  While reading an adventure novel about young people in extreme peril trying to retain such virtue as they possess while being caught up against their will in the world of piracy, the reader is also led along the path of understanding the corruption that remains within businesses and governments and the process by which piracy and illicit behavior endangers legitimate activities and eventually encourages nations to devote the resources to removing safe bases of operation from those engaged in piracy and other corrupt behavior.

This is not only a novel that entertains with a dramatic and exciting plot, nor occasionally disturbs the reader with its grim realism in dealing with pirate humor that would only be found these days by a member of one of Tampa’s pirate krewes during Gasparilla festivals, but also instructs the reader on contemporary reality that mirrors the uncertain days of the early 1800’s when the rule of law slowly cut off the freedom of the seas that allowed piracy to prosper. An afterword provides a brief historical commentary on the real and imagined characters within the novel as well as their world. For those who like their language salty, their novels full of real historical characters, their plots full of action like raiding ships and fortresses and dealing with corrupt political leaders, as well as a little bit of time slip to add some contemporary relevance, this novel will have much to offer, as long as the reader is not squeamish about its language or its contents.

Nathan Albright lives in Portland, Oregon.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Ships of Oak, Guns of Iron: The War of 1812 and the Forging of the American Navy

utt-ships-oak-guns-ironBy Ronald D. Utt,  Regnery Publishing, Washington, DC, (2012).

Reviewed by David Curtis Skaggs, Ph.D.

Entering the lists of War of 1812 naval history contenders is Ronald Utt’s Ships of Oak, Guns of Iron that seeks to demonstrate that this conflict forged the respected United States Navy that emerged in the nineteenth century. Or at least that is what his subtitle suggests is the objective of this popularized account of naval portion of what the British term “the second American war.” Utt enters in the long line of jousters that includes James Fenimore Cooper, Theodore Roosevelt, and C. S. Forester. His most recent competitor is George Daughan’s 1812: The Navy’s War (2011).

A recently retired research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, Dr. Utt is the author of numerous economic studies; this is his first effort at historical writing.  He writes with verve and a thorough understanding of maritime terminology. His descriptions of naval engagements evoke the smoke and sound of battle as effectively as any previous writer.  Epitomizing his lively prose is the description of the USS Constitution as “this great oaken beast of war.” On the other hand, the excessive use of long quotations from secondary sources interrupts his engaging literary style.

Unfortunately Ships of Oak, Guns of Iron is filled with errors of fact that cause those familiar with the conflict to cringe. The intrepid captain of the sloop-of-war Wasp, Johnston Blakeley, has his last name consistently misspelled.  Several times the ranks of British and American officers are incorrectly noted. Anyone who describes Put-in-Bay, Ohio, as “off the eastern shore of the Bass Islands” in Lake Erie has not looked at a map. Most grievous is the suggestion that Commodore Isaac Chauncey on Lake Ontario was “a good strategist and an excellent judge of character in the subordinates he selected and to whom he gave great responsibility: Oliver Hazard Perry, Winfield Scott, Thomas Macdonough, and Zebulon Pike.”

Does Utt not understand that Generals Scott and Pike were not selected by Chauncey nor were they under his command, that on Lake Champlain Macdonough had an independent command, and that although Perry was selected by him and was his subordinate, the eventual victor on Lake Erie was so exasperated with his superior that he offered his resignation in frustration over what he considered was a lack of support?  Little criticism is given Chauncey’s failure to achieve naval dominance on Lake Ontario in what is known as the Burlington Races on 28 September 1813.  Compared the other “Preble’s Boys,” Chauncey proved a master builder of ships and a timorous combat commander.

There is little appreciation of Secretary of the Navy William Jones’ efforts to balance the naval effort between the lakes and the high seas and to understand how important was his policy of combining U.S. Navy and privateer efforts against British commercial interests.   It was the unromantic efforts of destroying merchant ships that would influence His Majesty’s Government to consider ending the conflict more that the occasional ship-to-ship duels that fascinate this author.

For those unfamiliar with the Navy of this period, Ships of Oak, Guns of Iron is an animated place to begin. But in the final analysis this is another narrative history based mostly on a limited list of secondary sources with no thesis and no new information for those familiar with the naval aspects of the War of 1812. Those who want the latest scholarship should consult such works as Troy Bickham, Weight of Vengeance (2012), Kevin McCranie, Utmost Gallantry (2011), and Alan Taylor, The Civil War of 1812 (2011).

Dr. Skaggs is a professor emeritus of history at Bowling Green State University and the author of three books on the naval War of 1812 on North America’s Inland Seas published by the Naval Institute Press.  His Frontier Struggle in the War of 1812: William Henry Harrison and the Conquest of the Ohio Country will be published by the Johns Hopkins University Press later this year.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – The Privateering Stroke: Salem’s Privateers in the War of 1812

rutstein-privateering-stroke-salem-1812By Michael Rutstein, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Salem, MA (2012).

Reviewed by James C. Bradford, Ph.D.

Despite its important role in American defense policy from the Revolution through the War of 1812, privateering has never been the subject of a comprehensive study.  This accounts, in part, for the fact that privateering, i.e., the system of licensing privately-owned vessels and individuals to capture enemy shipping, remains so poorly understood. Popular histories and the general public, more often than not, conflate privateering and its practitioners with piracy and/or commerce raiding by national navies. Historians of the War of 1812 have long understood that economic considerations, as much as military and naval defeats, led British leaders to seek peace in 1815. The 500 privateers licensed by the U.S. government contributed significantly to that pressure by capturing an average of 33 vessels per month worth a wartime total value of $40 million. These losses drove the price of British imports upward and pushed insurance rates to unprecedented levels.

A comprehensive history of privateering, even American privateering during the War of 1812, will require numerous more focused studies. Jerome R. Garitee The Republic’s Private Navy: the American Privateering Business as Practiced by Baltimore during the War of 1812. (1977)  thoroughly analyzes the operations and finances of the vessels operated under the 185 privateering commissions issued to Baltimore groups and individuals during the War of 1812. Michael Rutstein, the owner and captain of the two-masted schooner Fame, a “representation” of a Salem privateer, follows his lead in this study of the 43 privateers commissioned in Salem, Massachusetts, during the same era. These vessels ranged in size from small open boats that preyed upon shipping along the coasts of Maine to the three ships and one brig of over 250 tons that cruised as far as South America and the Irish Sea.  The majority (25) of the Salem privateers were schooner-rigged, fifteen of which displaced fewer a 50 tons.   After a brief overview of privateering in Salem, Rutstein summarizes extant information concerning each vessel, its owners and investors, and the operational career of each ship in one to twenty pages.

Rutstein divides these descriptions into five roughly chronological “books” which form the heart of the work: The first book describes the nine vessels of various kinds rushed into service as privateers at the outbreak of war; book two the six larger ships that took more time to prepare for service so did not put to sea until later in 1812; and book three the first ten purpose-built privateers. During the first year of war American courts ruled a ship caught “trading with the enemy, or under a British license [to be] a valid prize,” and book four traces the careers of the nine vessels that cruised in search of such capture.  This is an aspect of privateering virtually ignored by other studies.  The fifth and final book chronicles the activities of nine privateers during the last year of the war.

During the two-and-a-half years of war Salem privateers took 300 prizes—130 were taken into port condemned and sold, 78 were recaptured by the British, 39 were released, 35 destroyed, nine ransomed, and nine taken into port but returned to their owners. Rutstein calculates that a third of the privateering ventures were profitable, but notes that by war’s end 26 of the 43 vessels that engaged in privateering had been lost. Thus the entire enterprise was a gamble.

Perhaps of most value to the historian are the 25 pages of tables of information gleaned from both primary and secondary sources.  These include 1). Compilations of information about each vessel and its commission; 2). The name, date captured, captor, and value of the 24 ships taken by the British, and the date, location, and value of the two ships wrecked; and 3).  The name, date taken, captor, cargo, value, and disposition of each vessel captured.  A similar table listing owners, investors, and profits would be equally useful.

Though Rutstein falls short of the standards set by Garittee for analyzing the business aspects of privateering or its effects on the people or economy of Salem, he is to be applauded for the depth of his research in U.S. sources—there is only a single reference to a British or Canadian primary source—and for making much of it available to future researchers.

Dr. Bradford currently sits in the Class of 1957 History Chair at the U.S. Naval Academy.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seawolf: Maritime Strategy Covered In Sub History Seminar

sub history 2013 seawolf

With the Covert Submarine Operations exhibit in the National Museum of the U.S. Navy’s Cold War Gallery serving as a backdrop, a large crowd filled the Gallery’s North Hall on the evening of 11 April 2013 (coinciding with the Submarine Force’s 113th Birthday) to witness and participate in a program titled “Seawolf and The Maritime Strategy: Examining the Relationships of Policy, Strategy, Technology, Tactics and Acquisition.“

In what has become a fixture on the April calendar for over a decade, the joint Naval Submarine League – Naval Historical Foundation Submarine History Seminar reviewed how the U.S. Navy’s posture changed from the Carter years of being a reactionary one that assumed the Soviet Navy would replay the role of the Germans in fighting a Battle of the Atlantic III, to a proactive strategy during the Reagan years that aimed at attacking Soviet ballistic missile submarines at the onset of war. A key was a realization by American Navy leaders that the Soviets had little interest in using their submarine forces to interdict allied operations in the North Atlantic. This shift in American thinking on how to employ forces in a general war with the Soviet Union became known as “The Maritime Strategy” and the Seawolf submarine, of which only three were built, was designed as a big, fast, quiet, torpedo-laden weapon system that could effectively operate in hostile waters.

The participants were asked to address some of the following questions:

  • Did any technical development or acquisition requirement stem from a policy decision or strategic direction?
  • What if any tactical operational results or requirements influence policy decisions or strategic direction?
  • If the policy or strategy directions did not specifically influence the Seawolf design, what or who made the design tradeoffs and decided the ship’s characteristics?
  • How much, if any, did the Maritime Strategy fundamentals influence the deployments and operations of submarines in the rest of the Cold War? (Before and after open publication).
  • When did the Soviets recognize any vulnerability to the Maritime Strategy? Did that recognition reach their national leadership?
  • Was the Maritime Strategy ever acknowledged by Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) or political leaders of the Administration (other than Secretary Lehman)? Did the strategy have any impact on these civilian officials or was it simply an internal/external Navy document?
  • How influential was the Maritime Strategy on the design and acquisition of ships and weapons? (Seawolf as the anti-bastion cracker, expansion of MPA, deployment of S3, creation of Aegis).
  • Did the long term on-going submarine operations themselves influence the Maritime Strategy?
  • In the actual plans that reflected the Maritime Strategy, submarines were seen as the leading edge of the assault on Soviet Navy. When was this offensive concept extended to other parts of the Navy? (i.e. Exercise Northern Wedding).

To address the questions,  three distinguished individuals assembled to discuss the design of Seawolf and the evolving thought process that led to the Maritime Strategy.

  • Rear Admiral Millard S. Firebaugh, U.S. Navy (Retired) served as an engineering duty officer and was assigned to the Naval Sea Systems Command during the early 1980s.  There he initiated the Seawolf Class submarine program which he managed through design and award of contracts for the first two ships of the class.
  • Captain Peter Swartz, U.S. Navy (Retired) served in the Navy as a General Unrestricted Line Officer, worked in the Chief of Naval Operations and Secretary of the Navy’s staffs in the 1980s, contributing to the development and dissemination of The Maritime Strategy.
  • Ambassador Linton F. Brooks has over five decades of national security experience, much of it associated with nuclear weapons and deterrence.  As an active duty Navy Captain he served on the Navy staff and the National Security Council staff in the 1980s, where he has active in shaping and promoting the Maritime Strategy.

Over a series of three 20 minute talks followed by a lively discussion with a most engaged audience, the questions posed to the three panelists by the moderator were addressed. Rear Admiral Firebaugh acknowledged that the Maritime Strategy was a bit above his pay-grade and his focus was to design and build a submarine to meet specifications that were originally initiated by Admiral Hyman G. Rickover. In looking at the specifications to build an underwater platform that would deploy with an expectation that weapon reloads may not be feasible, it was clear how Seawolf was meant to be employed.

In contrast, Captain Swartz  provided a grander vision of some 21 factors that enabled the Maritime Strategy to become reality ranging from a change of administrations, the availability of funding, the educational pedigree of the officers assigned to the CNO and SECNAV staffs, an understanding of Soviet Navy wartime intentions, the entry into the fleet of ships, aircraft and weapon systems that proved to be very capable, the rise in ranks of fleet commanders who embraced an offensive posture, and advances in technology as exhibited by advances in computers and other electronic systems. Swartz also addressed how The Maritime Strategy was embraced within the Defense establishment. He noted that in an era of Goldwater – Nichols legislation that called for the services to work together in joint harmony, The Maritime Strategy was very joint. However, the other services did not quite view it that way.

Finally Ambassador Brooks took on the broader implications of The Maritime Strategy with the concept that at the onset of Soviet tanks rolling into West Germany, the U.S. Navy would take an offensive posture on the northern flank and go after Soviet strategic assets. This strategy challenged the notion that attacking Soviet missile submarines was the last thing you would want to attempt, as it might trigger the Soviets to fire their sea-based missiles against the United States.  Instead, Brooks highlighted a change in thinking that if Soviet leaders saw their sea-based strategic assets suddenly disappear, they might be less inclined to escalate the conflict to a nuclear level.

The Naval Historical Foundation is currently transcribing the proceedings of the seminar and will provide interested individuals copies for a small fee to cover the transcription, publish-by-demand costs, and shipping. To obtain a copy of the seminar proceedings, contact Dr. David F. Winkler at dwinkler@navyhistory.org.

 

Posted in Cold War Gallery, History, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Refighting the Pacific War: An Alternative History of World War II

bresnahan-refighting-pacific-warEdited by Jim Bresnahan, Naval Institute Press, 2011.

Reviewed by Rear Admiral Ed Keats, USN (Ret)

Counter factional histories have been popular with chimerical writers over many years. I can recall from high school days being fascinated with a book based on the author’s imagination of an early ending to the Civil War right after the Battle of Bull Run in 1861. According to him, a peace agreement was signed removing the objection of the Union to the Confederated States declaring their independence from the United States. The author described how the resurgent South later took over the northern portion of Mexico and soon annexed Cuba. He also described the abolition of slavery before the end of the Nineteenth Century followed by the forced repatriation of all southern Negroes to Africa.

Other authors have described a long rule of Alexander in Asia, the conquering of Rome by Hannibal, and a British victory in our Revolution – among many fanciful themes.

Now, Jim Bresnahan has added to the collection, but with a different approach. He reduces his scope from the great to the minor, focusing on the tactical engagements of World War II in the Pacific. He does not conceive of a Japanese victory, perhaps it is too far fetched for him; rather he examines a number of battles while proposing that different ways of fighting might have achieved US success with reduced loss of American lives or, at least, shortening the time required to win the war.

Overall, the utility of the book appears to be as a guide for the minutia of war making, something for studies at a military college or in a specialized course at a university. One cannot believe that it would have an appeal to a general audience. Leaving aside those qualifications, the question remains as to how well Bresnahan carries out his limited purpose.

Bresnahan calls himself the editor of this volume, not the author. He has selected a group of people interested in the Pacific War to provide their thoughts in short essays on various military actions. He does not present opposing views; thus, they do not debate on his pages, rather they present just their own opinions. Since they, at this late date, have had an opportunity to review the detailed reports of US participants and those of Japanese survivors, they can look down from above, as it were, on what went on. They have had ample time to consider the actions taken in the heat of fighting by commanders who did not know of the plans of the enemy, nor even in most cases, of the location and disposition of the opposing forces. More importantly, the contributors to Bresnahan’s book were not worn out from months at sea on ships buffeted by wind and waves while suffering from lack of sleep.

The book brings to mind the discussions that take place at many local taverns on Monday nights following Sunday’s football games. What play should the coach of the local team have called on fourth down with a yard to go when time was running short and his team was down by four points? Now, a day later, we are aware that he called for a quarterback plunge. We also know that it was stopped short. With cognizance of the result, some can state with confidence that he really should have called for a pass or, alternatively, a trick play around the end, or a punt.

Are those reviews worthwhile? Yes, if they make an evening pass more pleasantly. No, if they have as their purpose the education of coaches. Would anyone benefit if the arguments had been recorded and published? I doubt it.

I feel in similar fashion regarding “Pacific War.” Jim Bresnahan may have enjoyed compiling the book, but it serves a very limited useful purpose.

RADM Keats is a veteran of several campaigns in the Pacific during World War II.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEW – Voyage to Jamestown: Practical Navigation in the Age of Discovery

hicks-voyage-discovery-jamestownBy Robert D. Hicks, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis MD. (2011)

Reviewed by Mark Lardas

When Britain’s first North America colonies were established, transatlantic voyages were challenges analogous to trips to the Moon today. What did it take to sail the Atlantic four centuries ago?

Voyage to Jamestown: Practical Navigation in the Age of Discovery; by Robert D. Hicks, explores that question.

The book presents the trip as a fictionalized voyage of the ship Guyft as it sails from Bristol, England to Jamestown in the Virginia colonies in the last four months of 1611. The reader sees the voyage through the eyes of Tristram Hame, Guyft‘s captain, as he takes his ship from Bristol’s docks to the James River.

While the voyage is fictionalized, Hicks’s descriptions are based on hard fact and the results of a lifetime of research on the archeology of the era, study of navigational techniques then used, and seamanship acquired through practical experience.

Hame is based on an actual captain of the period, Tobias Felgate . Guyft is based on the 120-ton Susan Constant, flagship of the expedition that established Jamestown in 1607.

Hicks used a composite voyage to allow readers to better experience all aspects of a trip to the New World. During its journey Guyft fights foreign ships, visits mid-Atlantic islands, cruises Spanish waters, experiences death, and weathers a hurricane.

Hicks places each encounter and adventure in historical context. He details then-current legal theories, medical practices, and technology affecting the actions of Guyft and Hame. Hicks also explains the centrality of religion and shows that science was viewed differently. To Hame, “science is theoretical knowledge that could be ascertained with certainty.”

The heart of Voyage to Jamestown is Hicks’ explanation of the period’s navigation. Hame is used to take the reader through the process of navigating a ship on a transoceanic voyage. Hicks provides detailed descriptions of the tools and methods that Hame would have used, the texts Hame would use as references, and the education available to navigators of that time.

To help modern readers, the book is copiously illustrated with period material and modern photographs. This includes photos of real and replica seventeenth century navigation tools, including many showing Hame (who bears a striking resemblance to Hicks) using these tools.

Voyage to Jamestown is a book that will fascinate a variety of audiences: those interested in history, readers with and interest in astronomy, or just those interested in vicariously sailing the seventeenth century Atlantic.

Mark Lardas, an engineer, freelance writer, amateur historian and model-maker, and former Shuttle navigators, lives in League City. His website is marklardas.com.

Amazon Button

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment